Popular Posts

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Friday Man as a Stereotype of a Colonial Native

When European colonial authors introduce us to the native, they have created a native; native character became a real European readers of the actual inhabitants of the New World.

 Huge otherness natives' overshadowed any individuality that can be found among them. The home was childish, usually incapable of reason, and savagely unchristian, contrary to the European. Robinson Crusoe was first introduced us to Friday as various native in a certain way.
 Friday, a native that he represents, and persists even in the post-colonial literature. In general, he became a stereotype in literature, but Friday- Crusoe connection is quite different from the typical European-native relations colonial era.
"" In the past few decades encounter Robinson and Friday took over the importance that Daniel Defoe is a thousand miles from even suspected. "Michel Tournier. The Wind Spirit"
In colonial literature in his home is, as a general rule, the ugly. For example, Robinson Crusoe describes color on Friday as an exception in the "ugly yellow torment Tawny, as Brasilians, and Virginians, and other natives of America" ​​had a (208).

In his idealization of his new slave, tourism stressed that he did not have ugly skin that natives often had. By separating the Friday of the typical native, he has improved the appearance of it. Robinson describes Friday: "He was handsome handsome Fellow, perfectly well made, with a real strong limbs, not too big, tall and well shap'd, and as I reckon, about twenty-six years old. He is a very good figure, not so strong and surly aspect, but seem'd to have something very manly in his face, and yet had all the sweetness and softness in the face of European, especially when smil'd. His hair was long and black, not curl'd as wool; forehead very high, and large, and large Vivacity and sparkling sharpness in his eyes. The color of his skin was not quite black, but very tawny; and yet not ugly yellow torment Tawny, as Brasilians, and Virginians, and other inhabitants of America are; but of bright type Dun olive color, which had in it something very acceptable; Tho 'it is not easy to describe. His face was round and plump; nose small, not flat like a black, very good mouth, thin lips, and his turn teeth well set, and white as Ivory. "He looks as opposed to" black people. "
"After defining the obvious physical characteristics Friday, Robinson Crusoe immediately began making assumptions about these characteristics that he could not see. These assumptions have led to stereotypes that have become a key component in building the other hand, native. After Friday Crusoe kills the attacker, he describes how Friday came to him and put his head under foot Robinson: "When he espied, he ran, and I laid on the ground again, with all the possible signs of a humble, grateful disposition, as many ancient gestures to show it. Finally he gave me his head flat on the ground, close to my foot, and sets my other foot on the head, as previously done, and after that, of all the characters I subjection, servitude and submission possible, to let me know how many I serve when he lived in the little time I began to talk to him, and teach him to talk to me ,. and first he know his name should be Friday, which was the day I saved his life. I also learned to say, 'Master', and then let him know that was to be my name. "'
It could be a sign of gratitude, fear, awe, or one of many other emotions, but Crusoe automatically assumed that it "seems a sign of swearing to be my slave forever." Also, when it was first seen, he looked at him as a potential employee who says that the original is stereotyped subordinate. To slavers so you can sleep with a clear conscience, they had to constantly tell myself that the non-Europeans are natural slaves. Throughout the rest of the novel, Friday and continue to act in a manner stereotypical happy to celebrate. Colonial author uses this subordination to dehumanize their mother.
By calling on the Indian 'Friday' tourism denies its former name, the meaning of his former culture and its significance. With the past, the cultural world Friday wiped out, it comes down to his role as a servant Crusoe. Crusoe regrets later in the novel, making friendship with him. "In relations with the Friday, there is a strong strain of superiority and condescension on behalf Crusoe, who is driven by imperialism and ethnocentrism. Crusoe retains an innate sense of racial and genetic superiority typical Englishman of his era, place, and classes."
Crusoe is a man who builds a replica of the physical and moral world is left behind, and he wants to be king of the world. He imitates the aristocracy trying to be a man who owns the site and has a way. "His superiority over Friday is evident, even though he has tourism informs its insignificant cells in European society," mine was in the middle of the country, or what might be called the upper station of the Low Life "(Defoe, p. 4)." The first thing he did after Friday his name and placing him as a slave was given Friday his clothes-western. Crusoe imposes its culture through Fridays, which turned out to be able and willing to receive it, Crusoe teaches him his language and gives him a new identity and faith while he does not want to know anything about their culture. "And on Friday and the lack of acquisition of speech in novels is very important. In Robinson Crusoe Friday has been described as a very fast learner and a good student (213.) His character is used as a vehicle for important discussions and information on religious and moral issues, which adds other types of narration in the novel. Within Robinson Crusoe Friday not only learn English, but can discuss theological ideas and theories. "In the colonial and post-colonial literature, all the characters, and European and non-European, are given the opportunity to learn the language and customs of others. Robinson taught Friday "Angleščina so good to be able to answer almost all questions ..." (216). After only a few weeks in his native has learned enough English to hold a conversation.
 Defoe, typical colonial author, never doubted intellect natives. Their inadequacy of the English language (and even on religion and morality) are explained as symptoms are isolated from Europe. Through a quick, intense training, the native may educated enough to be useful to the European. In the same novel, the European people have learned the language of the natives after being stranded at various island under a different scenario. Robinson used Friday as a translator for the Spaniard saved "the Spaniard spoke the language of savages pretty well" (241). The Spaniard is the use of language in the native and indigenous to the understanding of English was good enough that it was easier to communicate in two languages, but to try to speak directly between the Spanish and English language closely related. This example shows how the native and the Europeans were able to learn the language of another, when they need a position to do so. Within the text of speech and communication represents the action of civilization and socialization.
Through the teaching of speech, in Defoe's novel, Friday is also learned the importance of religion and make you think about your old life as inferior to the Christian way. So much so that when asked whether he would return to his cannibalism, if he is to return to his homeland, he replied that he would not and could, in fact, try to teach his countrymen the Christian way (p. 226).
Friday is portrayed as intelligent, deep thinker. He learned the language quickly and deeply, so that he shall enter into conversations involving subjects far from his situation. In conversations with Crusoe on coming up with arguments that are provocative and intelligent. He calls to question many things that tourism is taken for granted in terms of religion, for example, the relationship between the devil and God (220). It is not only the intellect to see that they are good if not better than Crusoe; in battle and fighting Friday points out himself, much Crusoe surprise.
What Defoe wrote in the 16th century, was a high-risk contraversial audience, because the natives were seen at the time, just like slaves without intellect and reason.

tags: Friday Man as a stereotype Colonial Native

The Media and Its Development

Definition media tools used to store or provide data or information.
We have different types of media, such as advertising media, electronic media, digital media, electronic media, hypermedia, mass media, multimedia, media, print media, published media, recording media and social media. In the next few pages we will focus on the mass media and its development.
"Mass media is media that is intended for a large audience. It can be in the form of electronic media, as in the case of television and radio, or print media, such as newspapers and magazines. Internet media can achieve mass media status, and many mass media media maintain a web presence to take advantage of ready availability of the Internet in many regions of the world. Some people also refer to the mass media as the "mainstream media" refers to the fact that it tends to stick prominent stories that will be of interest to a general audience, sometimes neglecting Breaking News controversial. Many people around the world rely on the mass media for news and entertainment, and globally, the mass media is a huge industry. "
In the modern world, the development of the media has increased. With its increase, potential sources of knowledge that individuals can use became available. While the mass media are fun and knowledge available to more people, also began to homogenize taste, style, and point of view between different groups in the United States. Class and ethnic differences in American culture began to fade as the mass media transmit movies and music people across the United States. Some people have criticized the growing uniformity of mass culture to reduce the overall standard of taste, because the mass media sought to satisfy the greatest number of people citing simpler than more complex taste. However, culture has become democratic as modern technology and mass media allowed it to reach more people.
Mass media in its various forms has played an important role in the democratic process for centuries, but with the establishment of new electronic networks the ability to influence the media in the way we govern is significantly increased. First press, then radio, then television facilitate communication necessary for democracy to be realized. One of the ways in which electronic networks can increase the spread of democracy citizens with the information they want or need. Increased information allows citizens to better arguments and more knowledgeable decisions about issues that affect themselves and their communities. Because democracy in theory supports the government people and nations, access to more information improves the original concept of self-government. The history of mass media can be traced back to the early days of drama that are derived in different cultures. However, the term Mass Media was created with the print media that was also the first example. The first newspaper was printed in China 868 AD, but the high costs of labor and illiteracy among people, it is not prosper.Regarding origin of Mass Media, Europe can boast that it is the primary source. It was Johannes Gutenberg, which was first published in book printing in 1453.Gradually, in the period after World War II, have been introduced in the radio, television and video. Audio-visual content has become very popular because it provides information and entertainment. Of late, this is the internet, which has become the latest and most popular mass media. Here, data is generated through various websites and search engines. One can play games, listen to the radio, and working and chat with friends and relatives, regardless of location. It also provides information on a variety of subjects, such as literature, politics, science, sport, fashion, movies, education, career, jobs, etc. similar to other types of mass media. So, given the progress of science and technology, history of media has evolved and reached today's world the internet, mobile phones, blogs and podcasts.
To conclude: Media is probably one of the most powerful means by which the world may be affected. Many use it to express their ideas, fashion and lifestyle. Whether we admit it or not, some cultures dictate to us what we eat or wear this year and how we behave in a given situation. It is up to us whether we accept it or not ... but usually happy to accept as want-to-have everything we see in commercials. As we do not have enough brains to know what we want until we see / hear some nice and almost naked ladies in the business tells us that the juice that keeps in hand is one we have to drink immediately. And it goes on all over again-on TV, on the radio, the internet, on the street, etc. We can never avoid the bastards who want to buy their products and make them rich. There are some good media-democracy and knowledge available to everyone, but nothing is perfect, so it has its downsides, such as brainwashing and imposing certain ideas. Anyone can impose whatever they want. That is exactly what they are doing now. America is the main character in this game called "brainwashing".
While the mass media of entertainment available to more people, also began to homogenize taste, style, and point of view between different groups in the United States. Class and ethnic differences in American culture began to fade as the mass media transmit movies and music people across the United States. Some people have criticized the growing uniformity of mass culture to reduce the overall standard of taste, because the mass media sought to satisfy the greatest number of people citing simpler than more complex taste. However, culture has become democratic as modern technology and mass media allowed to occur more people.During 20th century, mass entertainment has extended the range of American culture, reversing the direction of impact as Europe and the world became a consumer of American popular culture.
America is now the dominant source of cultural entertainment and popular fashion, from jeans and T-shirts worn by young people in music groups and rock stars and listen to movies they see. People around the world view the American television programs, often years after the program's popularity has declined in the United States. American television has become an international match that American news help define what people in other countries know about current events and politics.
 American entertainment is probably one of the most powerful means by which American culture influence in the world, although some countries, such as France, resist this influence because they see it as a threat to their unique national culture 

tags:The Media and Its Development

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Does Really Money Make the World Go Round?

OK, I have to begin this post with one question.

Are you tired?...I don't mean physically tired,like when you feel tired after a long working day...But are you tired of spending days on job, going from this business trip to another,leaving your family home alone?Don't you ask yourself does it worth giving yourself to that earned money?

You don't give only your precious time that you could spend with your family but your health also. And what do you get?...Some will say something like:
-If I don't work this hard I couldn't afford to buy anything that my kids want-schools are expensive, they have to have the best designed clothes, internet, toys, video games, bike, motorbike or car, or new apartment when they turn 18...-

To be honest,your kids don't need all of that. All what they want is a piece of your attention and love.We are being bombed by commercials in every step trying to convince us that we need a new car, that the old cell-phone is not good enough for us, that the best destination for this summer is Tunis or Turkey which is waiting for us only etc...That are all bullshits we shouldn't allow to influence our lives because our lives can be good enough with less money in the pocket and more love in our hearts.

More appropriate question I have should ask you in the beginning is: Are you happy and if not,what would make you happy?!
I think that happiness is INSIDE every man. New things that we buy CAN make us happy but it doesn't last for long as it usually happens with all material things.After we wear a new dress a couple of times we wish to have another one,better one...and it doesn't have an end. Humans are simply like that!
They always want more,and more and more....until we find the piece of happiness we've been searching for and feel our soul is peaceful together with our body.
Here is the story about a boy who answers my questions:

A man came home from work late again, tired and irritated, to find his 5-year-old son waiting for him at the door.
“Daddy, may I ask you a question?”
“Yeah, sure, what is it?” replied the man.
“Daddy, how much money do you make an hour?
“That’s none of your business! What makes you ask such a thing?” the man said angrily.
“I just want to know. Please tell me, how much do you make an hour?” pleaded the little boy.
“If you must know, I make $20.00 an hour.”
“Oh,” the little boy replied, head bowed. Looking up, he said, “Daddy, may I borrow $10.00 please?”
The father was furious. “If the only reason you wanted to know how much money I make is just so you can borrow some to buy a silly toy or some other nonsense, then you march yourself straight to your room and go to bed. I work long, hard hours everyday and don’t have time for such childish games.
” The little boy quietly went to his room and shut the door. The man sat down and started to get even madder about the little boy’s questioning. How dare he ask such questions only to get some money?
After an hour or so, the man had calmed down, and started to think he may have been a little hard on his son. Maybe there was something he really needed to buy with that $10.00, and he really didn’t ask for money very often. The man went to the door of the little boy’s room and opened the door.
“Are you asleep son?” he asked.
“No daddy, I’m awake,” replied the boy.
“I’ve been thinking, maybe I was too hard on you earlier,” said the man. “It’s been a long day and I took my aggravation out on you. Here’s that $10.00 you asked for.”
The little boy sat straight up, beaming. “Oh, thank you daddy!” he yelled. Then, reaching under his pillow, he pulled out some more crumpled up bills.
The man, seeing that the boy already had money, started to get angry again. The little boy slowly counted out his money, then looked up at the man.
“Why did you want more money if you already had some?” the father grumbled.
“Because I didn’t have enough, but now I do,” the little boy replied.
“Daddy, I have $20.00 now. Can I buy an hour of your time?”

tags:Does Really Money Make the World Go Round?

Muslim Women in our Society?HIJAB VS. BIKINI...

The Western media portrays Muslim women wearing a hijab as weak, with scared eyes. Always the black hijab, eyes pleading for help from the western readers. Never once have I've seen a picture in a newspaper of a smiling Muslim woman wearing a colorful hijab. Head-coverings have been worn throughout history by billions of women around the world including Europe.

I had many more images to post in here but I just ran out of space for imagery and need to go clean house for now. But please enjoy this article.
They are beautiful, some are simply stunning. No one ever seems to note that the headgear of nuns such as Mother Theresa is a form of hijab!Western people seem to see this necessary article of clothing as being dowdy, ugly, repressive. They see the entire issue of the headscarf as ugly, frightening, different. Yet in the Medieval period, as shown above, women veiled and covered their hair in Europe for at least one thousand years.
“If a Jew lady lacks in following the rules like for example she would go without covering her head in street or in front of other men, or even her voice get heard by other men or neighbours. In this case her husband has the right to divorce her without giving her dowry.” ~ Will Durant

I maintain this modern fuss over the right of a Muslim woman to wear her scarf is an issue of racial and religious prejudice, perpetrated by TPT who are intent on rousing the hatred of people for each other, villianizing the Muslims, for their own disgraceful causes, mainly fueling of emotions to bring about international war or, as many refer to it as, the Apocalypse.
There are countries in which women are terribly abused by the males of that land. This is cultural, not Islamic. It is wrong by any standards and most Muslims from other lands are as dismayed by these events as are all other decent human beings. In fact, despite being Muslim and modestly dressed, were they to dress as they do in those nations, chances are they, too, would be punished or killed for not being "sufficiently Muslim".

As seen in the images below, Muslim women are not the victims of the scarf and most love it. It represents modesty, a beneficial trait which the pornographers of the planet cannot handle. When destroying society the woman, the base of it all, is first targeted. THAT, friends and neighbours, is why the hajib is so challenged in the Zionist run world of today.

Finding the middle ground in everything we do is what being a Muslim is all about. Having the right balance between the material and spiritual, is what is demanded of us. Muslim women are guided to dress modestly, and the hijab not the burkha ~ which is a cultural item ~ is the answer to this.

Many western women who revert to Islam always ~ and always choose of their own volition to wear the hijab/niqab. Most westerners, quite ignorant in the truth of the matter, would not hesitate to damn the hijab in equal measure and lump it together with the 'demeaning' burkha, unable to see what the Muslim women's dress code actually symbolizes.

Be prepared to see, not the sad and miserable women of the middle east as portrayed in the Media but women who appear whole, vibrant and exhibiting genuine smiles of happiness.

Might I also add, the head covering makes for much more luxuriant and healthy hair! I found mine grew longer before breaking up and splitting and was thick and just wonderful.
Covering the face with niqab or burqa, as it is practiced in some Islamic countries, is cultural rather than religious ~ the law of man, not the law of Allah..In truth millions of women around the world cover up
and there are as many styles as there are women.What is Hijab? It means that the woman should cover all of her body down to her wrists and ankles and wear opaque loose-fitting clothing. She is also admonished to cover her hair. Hijab is not only a way of dressing but it is also a way conducting oneself.in a modest and dignified manner.The wearing of Hijab is a means by which a Muslimah is identified. It sets us apart, and any Muslim man who sees a woman wearing Hijab should immediately understand that this is a woman who should be treated with the utmost respect.

Now, you the reader, may ask why should it make any difference what a woman wears? Unfortunately, in the society of man, it does.
Let me present you with an example of what I mean.

A pretty woman is walking down the street. She is wearing an outfit that brings attention to the fact that she is attractive. It may be a short skirt or a form fitting suit.

The typical male reaction would be whistles, catcalls or leering looks etc. For a time, this may make the woman feel special, but after awhile it becomes an annoyance because she is being looked at as an object not a person.Now, let us consider the same situation but the pretty woman is now wearing conservative clothing and she covers her hair with a scarf. What would be the male response now?As much as we would like to think that we live in a society where everyone is equal, this is not the case. Men as a rule will continue to think of women as objects of desire, servants, or baby factories.

In Islam, this is not the case as set down in the Qur'an. The wearing of Hijab is Allah's way of reminding men that women are people and should be treated accordingly. as hearth of the home and co-creator of life. An unfortunate circumstance but very much a fact of life.
This photograph from Kuwait is not, as some have suggested, a "clash of civilizations". These two women could purchase these outfits for private use. What they wear beneath their abaya or their burqa does not matter because the fabric of the cover serves as protection from strangers. The abaya is a continuation of the walls around her home in terms of safety.
On my wall, I have a picture of a Muslim woman shrouded in a burka.

Beside it is a picture of an American beauty contestant, wearing nothing but a bikini. One woman is totally hidden from the public; the other is totally exposed. These two extremes say a great deal about the clash of so-called "civilizations." The role of woman is at the heart of any culture. Apart from stealing Arab oil, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are about stripping Muslims of their religion and culture, exchanging the burka for a bikini. Breaking up the family unit as they have so successfully managed to accomplish in Europe and North America is an important part of bringing the civilization under Communist rule in which the State is parent to the child.I am not an expert on the condition of Muslim women and I love feminine beauty too much to advocate the burka here. But I am defending some of the values that the burka and modesty covering such as the hajib represent for me.To me, these coverings represent a woman's consecration to her husband and family. Only they see her. It affirms the privacy, exclusivity and importance of the domestic sphere. The Muslim woman's focus is her home, the "nest" where her children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training her children, providing refuge and support to her husband. In contrast, the almost naked Western beauty queen struts in front of millions on TV.

 A feminist, she belongs to herself. In practice, paradoxically, she is public property. She belongs to no one and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is auctioning herself all of the time.n America, the cultural measure of a woman's value is her sex appeal. (As this asset depreciates quickly, she is neurotically obsessed with appearance and plagued by weight problems.) As an adolescent, her role model is Britney Spears, a singer whose act approximates a strip tease.

 From Britney, a child learns that she will be loved only if she gives sex. Thus, she learns to "hook up" furtively rather than to demand patient courtship, love and marriage. As a result, dozens of males know her before her husband does. She loses her innocence, which is a part of her charm. She becomes hardened and calculating.

The feminine personality is founded on the emotional relationship between mother and baby. It is based on nurturing and self-sacrifice. Masculine nature is founded on the relationship between hunter and prey. It is based on aggression and reason. Feminism deceives women to believe femininity has resulted in "oppression" and they should adopt male behavior instead. The result: a confused and aggressive woman with a large chip on her shoulder, unfit to become a wife or mother.This is the goal of the NWO social engineers: undermine sexual identity and destroy the family, create social and personal dysfunction, and reduce population. In the "brave new world," women are not supposed to be mothers and progenitors of the race. They are meant to be neutered, autonomous sex objects.Liberating women is often given as an excuse for the war in Afghanistan. Liberating them to what? To be Britney Spears? To low-rise "see-my-thong" pants? To the mutual masturbation that passes for sexuality in America? If they really cared about women, maybe they'd end the war. But then, any excuse for aggression to steal from indigenous people whatever they wish, in this case the products of the poppy and a vital oil pipeline to the ocean. We all know the liberation of women means nothing, or less than nothing, to these individuals.
Parenthood is the pinnacle of human development. It is the stage when we finally graduate from self-indulgence and become God's surrogates: creating and nurturing new life.

 The New World Order does not want us to reach this level of maturity. Pornography is the substitute for marriage. We are to remain single: stunted, sex-starved and self-obsessed.Women will give birth and within a very short time the care and training of the child will be handed over to the state through nannies, daycares, etc. 
Over the years all parental tools have been weakened and with the dissolution of families, young couples are gullible to the wiles of state and medicine, their power stolen from them without them even aware of it so trained are they to accept the dictates of the medical profession.
We are not meant to have a permanent "private" life. We are meant to remain lonely and isolated, in a state of perpetual courtship, dependent on consumer products for our identity.
This is especially destructive for woman. Her sexual attraction is a function of her fertility. As fertility declines, so does her sex appeal. If a woman devotes her prime years to becoming "independent," she is not likely to find a permanent mate. However, that problem is being handled through the emasculation of the male through drugs and social manipulation and the politically correct protected promotion of alternative lifestyles.
Her long-term personal fulfillment and happiness lies in making marriage and family her first priority. Feminism is another cruel New World Order hoax that has debauched American women and despoiled Western civilization. 

It has ruined millions of lives and represents a lethal threat to Islam. 
I am not advocating the burka but rather some of the values that it represents, specifically a woman's consecration to her future husband and family, and the modesty and dignity this entails.

Among almost all Muslims today, there has been a huge change. Couples are couples and the polygamous faction has faded to a great degree. This, too, is a shame because it robs the poorer members of society, widows, etc of a place to live and leaves more of them in the dire position of poverty. The original reason for taking multiple wives was originally to accommodate the needs of such women.

Today in the more modern cities and areas of the Middle East, polygamy, while not a thing of the past, is no longer the norm. Also the cost of living has made it harder for a man to support more than one household since every wife is to be treated equally to the other in everything from time spent with each to the accommodations supplied.

The media portrays Muslim women wearing a hijab as weak, with scared eyes. Always with a black hijab, eyes pleading for help from the western readers. Never once have I've seen a picture in a Norwegian newspaper of a smiling Muslim woman wearing a colorful hijab.

Like the ones I do see every day. They are beautiful, some are simply stunning. I bought my own hijab last year because I think it looks so pretty.
 I have not worn it in public, but I've made numerous promises both online and in RL that I will wear the hijab, a burka or a niqab if a ban ever is to be implemented. And the police, politicians, feminists and racists would have a very hard time explaining why I, a liberated western woman wearing this garment of my own free will, was fined for being out in public. A very hard time indeed.

We in the west have a lot to learn about respect. And far too many of us need to learn that today integration has a meaning similar to assimilation.The women's liberation movement, the french revolution, the black power movement all led to the rights we in the west have today.

IA head covering on a Muslim is a political statement but it is not when on a Christian nun’s head. ~ Riem Spielhaus, Humbolt University.

The burka and the bikini represent two extremes. The answer lies somewhere in the middle.


http://businessbankmoney.blogspot.com/ http://pceladajemed.blogspot.com/